It’s a traditional DAW in the sense that tracks go top to bottom and arrangement flows left to right. Mixcraft has always offered a welcoming music production environment with a claimed ‘great ease of use combined with raw power’, and it’s hard to argue with this. (There’s also a cut-down Recording Studio version at $99 that lacks the Celemony Melodyne integration, a lot of the included plugin instruments and effects and other features, so we think Pro Studio is well worth the extra 100 bucks.) I would be most grateful if people here could give me their thoughts based on what I have just said.It might also not be on your radar because it’s a PC-only DAW, but if it is on your radar, you’ll know it comes packed with enough features to be a serious PC contender, and at just $199 for the top-end Pro Studio version on test here, it’s a bargain to boot. I really need Mixcraft for adding VST instruments, having a good piano roll and step sequencer and a straightforward easy to use interface. I also want to get Izotope Neutron and upgrade my Ozone 4 to the latest version.
I also have to upgrade to Reason 9 from Reason 7. I have plenty of instruments in Reason which I could rewire to Mixcraft as a slave device.ĭo I really need Mixcraft Pro or would Mixcraft 8 be enough. Anyway there is now Vocal Pitch editing in Reason 9 for the first time. I already have Melodyne Essential as part of Sonar and I bought an old version of Melodyne years ago when it was called something else so I know I have access to vocal editing. I like to program everything myself except I will gladly use percussion Loops if they are available alongside programmed Drum Parts. So thousands of Loops don't really interest me as I wouldn't use them. I don't use Loops at all except for percussion Loops.
The only question is do I get Mixcraft 8 or Mixcraft Pro 8. I have decided to buy Mixcraft this week.
0 kommentar(er)
